Unrealistic expectations

Design flaws

1 December 2005



Richard Neale explains how material faults can cause headaches for cleaners


Explaining a disappointing cleaning result is never straightforward, especially when the customer believes that the cleaner is trying to evade responsibility for a cleaning mistake.

The cleaner may only have one chance to convince the customer of the real culprit, so it is important to be able to recognise the fault and to have the full and correct explanation ready.

This month’s article looks at some complaints which can originate from natural flaws – faults which may be attributed to the unfortunate animal that first owned the fleece or, in certain cases, to sheer incompetence on the part of the garment manufacturing community, now too often shielded by several thousand miles and a language barrier.



Ink stains remain on shirt

Fault: An ink stain remained on a blue shirt afterdrycleaning.
Technical cause: The dyes to the blue shirt started to move when the cleaner tested the fabric with the standard ink remover, so the wise decision was not to attempt any more pre-treatment.
Responsibility: The cleaner has discharged his responsibility by attempting removal and halting treatment when the risk exceeded the prospects for improvement. The responsibility for the stain remains with the owner.



fibres pop fibres pop
dark trim dark trim
plastic snap plastic snap
ink stain ink stain
fleece panels fleece panels


Privacy Policy
We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.